MC-Guide
Content Writing
Website 22: Economichardship.org
How Can You Earn Money Writing For “economichardship.org” Website
This guide shows you, step by step, how a beginner can learn to pitch and sell stories to economichardship.org.
You will learn what economic hardship wants, how to test your idea, how to write a pitch, and how payment roughly works. You can use this like a small SOP.
Guide: How to Pitch & Publish with the Economic Hardship Reporting Project (EHRP)
This practical guide explains, step-by-step, how to research EHRP, build a publishable pitch or finished piece, use their pitch portal or contact emails, and (critically) how to craft writing that wins grants or co-publishing support. It includes templates, examples, and many links so you can go directly to their pages and related resources. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
Focus: narrative reporting, reported personal essays, op-eds, solutions journalism, audio/photo projects, and pitches that show lived experience and reporting chops. If you want to earn money by being paid, EHRP often supports work via grants or commissions — the site both funds and co-publishes reporting. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
Section 1 · What EHRP is
Mission, model, and who they support
The Economic Hardship Reporting Project (EHRP) is a U.S.-based nonprofit newsroom that funds, trains, and publishes journalism about poverty, workers’ rights, and economic inequality. They frequently co-publish commissioned pieces with mainstream outlets and provide grants to independent journalists to produce reported work. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}
EHRP’s work centers two related things: (1) supporting journalists who either have lived experience of economic hardship or who are producing in-depth coverage of inequality; and (2) getting that reporting into large outlets through co-publishing partnerships so it reaches readers and decision-makers. That model means EHRP both funds work and helps editors place it. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}
- Nonprofit newsroom focused on economic inequality in the U.S.
- Funds independent journalists (grants/commissions).
- Co-publishes stories with national outlets to expand reach. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}
- Accepts a variety of formats: features, essays, op-eds, audio, photo essays, and reported solutions journalism. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}
Their site lists a dedicated Pitch Portal and a contact address; they also note specific submission channels for opinion and personal essays. Use the pitch portal link or the submission guidelines page to start. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}
Editors & contact: the site publishes an editorial staff page and contact information for submission queries — keep these pages open while preparing a pitch. :contentReference[oaicite:8]{index=8}
Section 2 · Accepted work
Which formats and topics EHRP accepts (and prefers)
EHRP accepts and funds a wide range of nonfiction storytelling related to economic hardship and inequality. Typical accepted formats include:
- Long-form reported features (deep reporting into a systemic issue, 1,200–3,500+ words).
- Reported personal essays or narrative nonfiction (first-person reporting grounded in experience).
- Opinion pieces and op-eds that connect reporting to policy or solutions.
- Audio and podcast projects, photo essays, and multimedia storytelling that illuminate lived experience. :contentReference[oaicite:9]{index=9}
Why this matters: when you pitch, choose the format that best shows the reporting you can realistically do (e.g., if you have a small audio clip and interviews, propose an audio feature; if you have strong reportage with documents and sources, propose a reported feature).
- Worker rights, wage theft, union drives, and labor organizing.
- Poverty & safety-net policy (SNAP, TANF, Medicaid, housing).
- Healthcare access and the economic effects of illness.
- Criminal justice & economic impact on families.
- Stories that tie personal experience to structural causes.
- Narrative pieces where one or two characters lead readers through a problem.
- Data-rich features with accessible explanation and clear sourcing.
- First-person reporting with verification of facts and goodwill toward readers.
Practical tip: when in doubt, read their Submission Guidelines and Pitch Portal to see current priorities and open calls. :contentReference[oaicite:10]{index=10}
Section 3 · Researching EHRP’s work
How to study past pieces so your pitch fits
Before you pitch, do three focused reads of EHRP content: one narrative feature, one personal essay, and one co-published piece (their larger partners). Notice length, voice, sourcing, and how they tie personal stories to systems. Example co-publishes and recent features are linked on the homepage and newsroom. :contentReference[oaicite:11]{index=11}
How to take notes:
- Write down the article’s main argument in one sentence.
- List the reporting methods used (interviews, FOIA/documents, data analysis).
- Note the structure (lede, nut graf, scenes, sources, conclusion).
- Collect the byline and outlet it was co-published with — that helps you understand editorial fit and reach. :contentReference[oaicite:12]{index=12}
- EHRP homepage — shows recent projects and co-publishing partners. :contentReference[oaicite:13]{index=13}
- Submission Guidelines — must-read for rules and formats. :contentReference[oaicite:14]{index=14}
- Pitch Portal — where many pitches and grant requests are routed. :contentReference[oaicite:15]{index=15}
- Editorial staff — learn editors’ names and beats. :contentReference[oaicite:16]{index=16}
Section 4 · Pitch & grant workflow
Step-by-step: from idea to submitted pitch
Use this workflow whether you are asking for a grant/commission or submitting a finished essay/op-ed. EHRP sometimes accepts completed pieces (op-eds/personal essays) via email and solicits commissioned work via their pitch portal. Always check the current page for exact instructions. :contentReference[oaicite:17]{index=17}
Open the Submission Guidelines & Pitch Portal
Carefully read their submission guidelines and the pitch portal. Note whether they are accepting new pitches or have specific calls. If they list a Submittable manager or email, follow that channel exactly. :contentReference[oaicite:18]{index=18}
Decide whether you want funding or placement
Are you asking for a grant to report a story (EHRP funds reporting) or are you submitting a completed opinion/personal essay for publication? If you want a grant, propose a reporting plan with timeline and budget. If submitting a finished essay, follow the email instructions in the guidelines. :contentReference[oaicite:19]{index=19}
Keep it short, specific, and verifiable
Your pitch should include: a one-line hook, a 2–3 paragraph summary of reporting and findings (or plan), key sources/interviews you already have, why EHRP should fund/publish this (impact), an estimated timeline, and a short budget if asking for funds. Attach one or two strong clips or a portfolio link. :contentReference[oaicite:20]{index=20}
Submit the pitch where they ask
If the Pitch Portal is active, use the portal link. For opinion or personal essays, guidelines sometimes ask for direct email submissions to economichardshipreporting@gmail.com (check the current guidelines). If a Submittable page is listed, follow that process. :contentReference[oaicite:21]{index=21}
Track your pitch and be ready to provide more
Give editors time to respond (many nonprofit editors are busy). If you receive a request for more info, reply quickly with documents, additional sources, and a clear timeline. If the pitch is declined, ask politely for feedback and reuse the idea elsewhere. :contentReference[oaicite:22]{index=22}
Section 5 · Pitch templates & samples
Practical pitch language you can copy, tweak, and send
Hook: “A reported feature on how [city/town]’s day laborers are navigating recent wage rule changes, showing how enforcement gaps leave workers unpaid and what cities are doing differently.”
Paragraph 1 — Quick nut graf: What the story is, why it matters now, and an immediate example/character.
Paragraph 2 — Reporting plan: Who you will interview (names/positions where possible), documents or datasets you will use, how long it will take, and the outcome EHRP can expect (e.g., a 1,800–2,500 word feature + supporting photo captions). Finish with links to clips that show you can do this reporting.
Subject: Pitch — [Short Hook] — [Your name] Hi [Editor Name], One-line hook: A reported feature on how [group] in [city] are affected by [policy/event], revealing X and Y. Summary: I propose a [1,500–2,500]-word reported feature that focuses on [main claim]. I have already conducted initial interviews with [name, role] and secured documents from [agency/public record]. I plan to include first-person scenes, 3–5 interviews, and 2–3 supporting documents or datasets. Why EHRP: This fits EHRP’s focus on economic inequality and has potential for co-publishing / impact because [reason — local policy, new data, litigation, etc.]. Timeline & budget (if asking for funds): Reporting — 6–8 weeks. Proposed budget: $X for reporting & transcription. I can deliver a first draft by [date]. Clips & bio: [Link to 1–3 clips] — short bio: [1–2 sentences with beats & experience]. Thanks for considering this — happy to provide more detail. Best, [Your name] — [Email] — [Phone] — [Location]
Section 6 · Money, grants & co-publishing
How contributors typically get paid and what to expect
EHRP often funds reporting via grants or commissions and may co-publish the finished work with larger outlets. Payment levels vary widely depending on the project scope, budget availability, and whether the piece is an op-ed, a short essay, or a long reported feature. The safest approach is to include a modest, realistic budget in funding requests and to confirm payment terms before extensive reporting. :contentReference[oaicite:25]{index=25}
- Reporting days and approximate hours.
- Travel and document costs (public records, FOIA fees).
- Transcription costs (if interviews are recorded).
- Freelancer fees if you plan to hire a photographer/producer.
Be specific and conservative — small nonprofits appreciate reasonable budgeting.
- Co-publishing with a larger outlet can expand reach and may come with additional editing standards.
- Ask editors about promotional plans and how the piece will be distributed.
- Clarify rights: who holds first serial rights, and whether you can republish excerpts later. :contentReference[oaicite:26]{index=26}
If money is the main objective, be patient: nonprofit grant cycles and editorial decisions can take weeks. Always get written confirmation of grant amounts and payment schedules before incurring large expenses. :contentReference[oaicite:27]{index=27}
Section 7 · Ethics & lived experience
How to write responsibly about hardship
Because EHRP focuses on real people in precarious situations, ethical reporting is essential. This includes careful consent practices, protecting vulnerable sources, avoiding exploitative framing, and verifying claims. If you are reporting on people who face legal or economic risk, plan for confidentiality and safety. :contentReference[oaicite:28]{index=28}
- Obtain informed consent; explain how material will be used.
- Offer anonymity when necessary and explain limitations of anonymization.
- Keep careful notes and backups for interviews and documents.
- Verify facts with at least two independent sources where possible.
- EHRP often highlights writers with lived experience; if that is you, state it honestly in your bio and pitch.
- Do not overclaim — be clear about what you know firsthand and what you investigated.
- Editors value humility, verification, and a willingness to provide supporting documents. :contentReference[oaicite:29]{index=29}
Section 8 · Final checklist & SOP
Micro-SOP: final checks before you hit submit
Section 9 · FAQ and resources
Helpful links, common questions, and where to learn more
- Submission Guidelines — EconomicHardship.org. :contentReference[oaicite:35]{index=35}
- Pitch Portal — EconomicHardship.org. :contentReference[oaicite:36]{index=36}
- EHRP Submittable (where present). :contentReference[oaicite:37]{index=37}
- Editorial staff — who is on the team. :contentReference[oaicite:38]{index=38}
- Working Sources — directory of lived-experience experts. :contentReference[oaicite:39]{index=39}
- Contact page — emails & postal address. :contentReference[oaicite:40]{index=40}
- EHRP homepage — recent projects & co-publishes. :contentReference[oaicite:41]{index=41}
- Directory profile — context on mission. :contentReference[oaicite:42]{index=42}