MC-Guide

Content Writing

Website 120: Motherjones.com

How Can You Earn Money Writing For “Motherjones.com” Website

This guide shows you, step by step, how a beginner can learn to pitch and sell stories to Motherjones.com.

You will learn what Motherjones.com wants, how to test your idea, how to write a pitch, and how payment roughly works. You can use this like a small SOP.

Download PDF
writing & earning Setup
writing & earning Setup
Motherjones.com
Mother Jones · Contributor Snapshot
Pay: Typically assigned / negotiated Style: Reported, evidence-based Best for: Investigations · Politics · Environment Audience: News + magazine readers Difficulty: Intermediate–Advanced reporting
Ideal if you can pitch original reporting or a smart, well-sourced analysis. This guide teaches you a beginner-friendly system: how to study Mother Jones, write a strong pitch, draft cleanly, and build an income path around serious journalism.
Content Writing · 03 Beginner Friendly System Target: MotherJones.com

Guide: How to Get Paid to Write for Mother Jones (Step by Step)

This is a clean, beginner-friendly guide that teaches you how to study Mother Jones, pitch the right ideas, write a strong draft, and build a real plan to earn money from serious reporting (plus other income paths if the pitch is not accepted).

You also asked for as many learning links as possible. So you will see lots of links: official pages, research tools, journalism training, pitch examples, fact-checking resources, editing checklists, and legal/ethics references. Use this page like a mini-course + SOP.

Important note (honest): I included the official Mother Jones guidelines link you provided: motherjones.com/contribute/writer-guidelines. If any rule changes, the official guidelines page is the final source of truth.

Section 1 · Understand the publication

What “Mother Jones-style” writing looks like

To write for Mother Jones, you should think like a journalist first, and like a blogger second. The brand is known for reporting, investigations, politics, and issue-driven stories. That means editors usually want: original reporting, clear evidence, clean attribution, and a strong “why now”.

Here is a beginner-friendly way to understand “fit” without guessing: you will read real Mother Jones pieces, reverse-engineer their structure, then create your own pitch using the same pattern. This method also works for other magazine-style outlets (digital magazines, newsletters, and serious blogs).

🧠
What editors usually love
  • Fresh reporting: interviews, documents, data, FOIA, on-the-ground observations.
  • Clear accountability: who made the decision, who benefits, who gets harmed.
  • Receipts: primary sources, public records, datasets, credible research.
  • Readable writing: clean paragraphs, strong nut graf, simple explanations.
  • A real point: not “news for news,” but meaning + context + consequences.

If your idea is only “my opinion” with no reporting, it is usually a weak fit for a publication like this. You can still write opinion elsewhere — but here you should aim for evidence-led storytelling.

🚫
What usually gets rejected fast
  • Generic hot takes with no sources.
  • SEO filler (“Top 10…” with no reporting).
  • Brand promotion, affiliate sales, or PR-style content.
  • Copycat pitches that repeat what they already published.
  • “Big topic” with no focus (“I want to write about climate change”).

Your goal is to pitch a specific story with a reporting plan and a clear “so what?”

Story type What it looks like What you must prove Beginner-friendly entry?
Reported news analysis Explains a breaking story with context + consequences Credible sources + clear reasoning Yes (if you can source well)
Investigative feature Deep story: documents + interviews + accountability Original reporting + strong documentation Hard but possible (start smaller)
Explainer Makes a complex issue simple with evidence and examples Accuracy + great structure + citations Yes (strong beginner route)
Profile / narrative A person or community story with reporting and scenes Access + scenes + ethical reporting Yes (if you can interview)
Fast “fit” practice: Open 5–10 Mother Jones pages and read the headlines, ledes, and nut grafs. Use these links to explore quickly (opens Google site search so you can always find fresh pages): Investigations, Politics, Climate, Immigration, Guns, Supreme Court.

Section 2 · Fit your idea

Choose pitch-worthy ideas (even if you feel like a beginner)

Pitch

Many writers fail because they start with a topic, not a story. A good pitch is not “healthcare is bad.” It is: a specific claim + a reporting plan + evidence you can get + a clear reader benefit.

Use this beginner-proof idea generator. You will produce 10 ideas, then select 1–2 that are truly pitchable. This process is fast, and it protects you from wasting time on vague angles.

1
Idea Seed

Start with an “accountability question”

Pick one:

  • Who is making a decision?
  • What is the hidden mechanism (money, policy, lobbying, loophole)?
  • Where is the impact (a city, a workplace, a community)?
  • How is the system failing people?
  • Why now (a new law, a court case, a budget, an election, a crisis)?

Example seed: “Who is profiting from a policy change in my state, and what documents prove it?”

2
Evidence Check

Can you access primary sources?

Before you fall in love with an idea, check what evidence exists:

  • Government databases (budgets, procurement, court records)
  • Company filings (SEC / annual reports, if relevant)
  • Public records (property, licensing, inspections)
  • Academic research, credible reports, datasets
  • Interviews with affected people + experts

If your story has no evidence path, it becomes opinion-only. For Mother Jones-style outlets, evidence paths matter a lot.

3
Originality Check

Search: has Mother Jones already covered this?

Use these searches:

If they already covered it, you can still pitch — but you must bring a new angle, new data, or reporting that changes what we know.

4
Scope Control

Turn a “big issue” into a single story

Use this formula:

  • Big issue → one place → one mechanism → one set of victims → one accountable actor.
  • “Climate change” → “insurance collapse” → “one state policy gap” → “homeowners losing coverage” → “regulators + insurers.”
  • “Healthcare” → “medicaid eligibility” → “new verification rules” → “patients losing access” → “contractor + state agency.”

Editors prefer a story you can finish. A small, strong story beats a huge, weak story every time.

Idea strength Signs it’s strong Signs it’s weak Fix
High Named actors + documents + affected people + urgent hook None Pitch it
Medium Clear topic + some sources + angle Too broad, missing reporting plan Add reporting plan + narrow scope
Low Opinion-only No evidence path + no access Convert into explainer with credible sources or pick new idea
Beginner shortcut: If you feel you have “no access,” start with an explainer pitch that is still evidence-based. Use government reports, reputable research, and clear examples. Then build relationships for future reported work.

Section 3 · Research system

A practical research workflow for magazine-quality writing

Docs People Data

High-quality outlets reject a lot of pitches because writers do not show the research path. If you can show your reporting plan, you instantly look more professional.

Below is a simple workflow you can reuse for every pitch: Document → People → Data → Verification → Narrative. This is beginner-friendly, but it produces a professional output.

📄
Step A: Documents first

Documents are your safest base. Even before interviews, collect a “document stack” so you are not guessing.

For each document, write one line: what it proves, what it does not prove, and what question it creates.

🎙️
Step B: People and interviews

After documents, talk to people. You usually need 3 categories: affected people, experts, and responsible decision-makers (or their spokespeople).

Beginner tip: Do not “ambush interview.” Start with respectful outreach, clear purpose, and consent about quoting. Keep notes clean. Record only when allowed by law and with consent.

📊
Step C: Data and verification

“Data” does not mean fancy. It means anything that quantifies reality: budgets, counts, rates, outcomes, time series.

Verification rule: any number you use should be traceable to a reliable source and explainable to a normal reader.

🧾
Step D: Attribution + “receipt links”

Strong journalism feels safe because readers can check claims. Build a habit: every claim has a source (document, interview, dataset, credible report).

Keep a “receipts” folder: PDFs, screenshots, links, interview notes, timestamps, and a short summary of what each item proves. This makes editing faster and reduces legal risk.

Beginner warning: Never rely on one source for sensitive claims. Use multiple sources (documents + interviews + data). Avoid defamation risk: attribute controversial claims and use precise language.

Section 4 · Pitch writing

How to write a Mother Jones-quality pitch (with templates)

1 2 3 4

A pitch is a business document. It is not a “hey I’m a writer.” It is a short proof that: the story matters, you can report it, and the publication should trust you.

Always start from the official guidelines: Mother Jones Writer Guidelines. Read it slowly and note: what they accept, what they reject, how they want pitches sent, and what format they prefer. If anything in this guide conflicts with their official page, follow the official page.

Pitch Part 1

Subject line that editors actually open

Use one of these formats:

  • PITCH: [Specific story claim] — [place] — [why now]
  • QUERY: [Investigation angle] (documents + interviews ready)
  • FEATURE PITCH: [Narrative hook] — [accountability focus]

Bad subject: “Freelance writer available.” Good subject: “PITCH: The contractor behind [program] — records show [mechanism] — impact on [group]”.

Pitch Part 2

First paragraph: the lede + nut graf

The opening must answer: what happened, who it affects, and why this matters now. Write it like a mini-article lede.

  • Hook: a surprising fact or concrete event.
  • Claim: the accountability point.
  • Why now: new policy, court case, election, data release, crisis.

Keep it short. Editors want clarity, not drama.

Pitch Part 3

Reporting plan: show you can deliver

Include 5 bullets:

  • Sources: who you will interview (categories are okay if names not confirmed).
  • Documents: what you already have or will request.
  • Data: what you will analyze or cite.
  • Counter-voices: who you will reach for response.
  • Timeline: realistic delivery plan.

A reporting plan is the fastest way to look professional, even if you are new.

Pitch Part 4

Why you: bio + clips (no ego)

Provide a 2–4 line bio focused on credibility: beats you cover, communities you know, languages, data skills, and reporting experience.

  • Link 2–4 best clips (published links).
  • If you have no clips, link 1–2 strong sample posts on your own site or Medium.
  • Link your portfolio and (if relevant) a data repo or project page.

Keep it humble and concrete: “I reported X,” “I analyzed Y,” “I interviewed Z.”

Pitch element What to include Common mistake Fix
Lede Concrete event + stakes Abstract theory Add real-world example + numbers
Nut graf Accountability + why now Missing point Write 1 sentence “This matters because…”
Reporting plan Docs + sources + response plan No plan Add 5 bullets (sources, docs, data, response, timeline)
Clips Best 2–4 links Too many Only strongest, most similar style
Copy-paste pitch template (fill in brackets):

Subject: PITCH: [One sentence claim] — [place] — [why now]

Paragraph 1 (lede + nut graf): [2–4 sentences explaining what happened, who is affected, what is new, and why it matters.]

What I will report:
  • Key question: [the accountability question]
  • Documents: [what you have / will request]
  • Sources: [affected people], [experts], [officials/spokespeople]
  • Data: [datasets, budgets, filings, records]
  • Right of reply: I will seek response from [named actors / agencies].
  • Timeline: [draft date] + [editing window].
Proposed format: [reported news analysis / explainer / feature] · [approx length]

Why me: [2–4 lines] + Clips: [link 1], [link 2], [link 3]

Section 5 · Draft the story

Write a magazine-quality article: structure that editors trust

MJ

Once an editor says “yes,” your job becomes simple: deliver exactly what you promised. The easiest way to do that is to use a repeatable structure and write cleanly.

Below is a structure that works for reported features, explainers, and news analysis. You can also use it on your own blog and for guest posts — it instantly makes your writing feel “professional.”

🧱
The “editor-proof” article skeleton
  • 1) Lede: one vivid fact, scene, or surprising number.
  • 2) Nut graf: what this story is really about (accountability).
  • 3) Context: what readers must know in 3–6 paragraphs.
  • 4) Evidence: documents + data + expert framing.
  • 5) Human impact: affected voices with consent and fairness.
  • 6) Response: right of reply for those criticized.
  • 7) So what: consequences + what happens next.

If you follow this, your story becomes clearer, safer, and easier to edit.

✍️
Write in a “fact-first” style

Make every paragraph do one job:

  • State a claim.
  • Support it with a source (document, expert, data, on-record quote).
  • Explain what it means in plain English.

Avoid long opinion paragraphs. If you interpret, show your reasoning and cite evidence. Strong outlets reward clarity and restraint.

Section Goal Beginner mistake Fix
Lede Make reader care Starts with history lesson Start with the sharpest new fact or scene
Nut graf Explain the point Missing “why now” Add urgency and stake
Evidence Prove it Only quotes, no docs Include documents + data + attribution
Response Fairness + safety No right of reply Contact subjects and include response or note no reply
Use Mother Jones itself as a writing teacher: pick 3 articles you love and outline them (H2/H3). Use these links to find examples fast: lede examples, attribution examples, document-driven phrasing, data + analysis examples.

Section 6 · Ethics & legal

Ethics, accuracy, AI, and legal safety (simple rules)

When you write about real people, real institutions, and real harm, ethics matters. Also: accuracy protects your reputation. And legal safety protects you and the publisher.

✅
The 7 “safe journalism” rules
  • Attribute anything controversial (don’t state rumors as facts).
  • Verify names, dates, titles, locations, and numbers.
  • Keep receipts (docs, transcripts, screenshots).
  • Offer right of reply to criticized subjects.
  • Use precise language (“alleged,” “according to,” “records show”).
  • Separate facts vs interpretation clearly.
  • Don’t overclaim: write what you can prove.

These rules keep you safe and make editors trust you.

⚖️
Basic legal awareness (beginner version)
  • Defamation: false statements presented as facts that harm reputation.
  • Privacy: publishing private facts without clear public interest.
  • Copyright: don’t copy text; quote fairly and cite.
  • Recording laws: ask permission and know your jurisdiction’s rules.

Helpful references: Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Cornell LII defamation, RCFP resources.

🤖
AI use: what is safe vs risky

Publications may have different AI policies. The safest universal approach: treat AI as a helper, not as the author.

  • Safe: brainstorm angles, improve readability, generate interview questions, create outline options.
  • Risky: using AI to “invent” facts, sources, quotes, or to draft without verification.
  • Rule: if you cannot verify it with a real source, don’t publish it.

Use AI to support your reporting workflow, not replace it. You are responsible for correctness.

🧼
Ethics resources (free)

If you write about vulnerable communities, do extra care: consent, harm minimization, and context.

Golden rule: if you cannot defend every claim with evidence, attribution, and fairness, rewrite it. Serious outlets value trust more than speed.

Section 7 · Micro-SOP

Final checklist before you pitch Mother Jones

Use this checklist every time. It keeps you calm, focused, and professional. If you can tick most of these, your pitch is ready.

If you scored low: don’t quit. Convert the pitch into a smaller explainer, publish it on your own blog, then pitch again with stronger clips.

Section 8 · Money paths

How writers actually earn money from serious journalism

$

You asked for a guide that helps a beginner write and earn money. Here is the honest reality: one publication should not be your only income plan. A smarter plan is a small “income stack.”

💵
Income Path A: Paid assignments

Many magazines and high-quality sites prefer assignments: you pitch, they accept, you deliver, they pay. Terms vary (rate, rights, timeline). Always clarify before writing the full draft.

  • When your pitch is accepted, ask about fee, kill fee, rights, and deadline.
  • Keep agreements in writing (email is fine).
  • Track invoices and payment dates.

Helpful basics: Freelance contract basics, Invoice guidance.

📈
Income Path B: Portfolio leverage

A Mother Jones byline (or a similar outlet) can become a “trust asset” that helps you earn elsewhere: higher-paying clients, speaking gigs, consulting, newsletter sponsorships, or paid research work.

  • Use 1–3 flagship pieces as your portfolio front page.
  • Pitch bigger outlets with those clips.
  • Offer services aligned with your beat: research briefs, writing, editing, data summaries.

Beginner move: create a simple portfolio on Clippings.me or a one-page site on Carrd.

Income stream What you produce Why it works Beginner start
Magazine / site assignments Accepted stories Direct pay Pitch a smaller explainer first
Newsletter Beat-based weekly insights Audience + sponsors Start on Substack or beehiiv
Freelance research Briefs + fact packs High value for orgs Offer on Upwork or direct outreach
Editing Line edits, fact checks Recurring clients Offer packages on LinkedIn
Courses / guides Skill training Scales Start with one small workshop
Do not chase every income stream at once. Pick one “cash stream” (assignments / client work) and one “asset stream” (portfolio / newsletter). Build slowly. Quality wins.

Section 9 · FAQ + resources

FAQ for beginners + a giant link library (so you can learn fast)

Can a complete beginner get published at Mother Jones?
It’s hard to start at a top-tier outlet if you have no clips and no reporting experience. But you can still build a path. Start with a strong explainer or a small reported story on your own blog, Medium, or a smaller publication. Then pitch Mother Jones when you can show clips + evidence discipline. This guide is designed to help you build that discipline.
Should I send a finished draft or a pitch?
Most serious outlets prefer pitches (queries) first. Always follow their official rules: Writer Guidelines. If they want pitches, send a pitch. If they want a full draft for certain formats, follow that. Do not guess.
What if my idea is good but I can’t get interviews?
Use a “document-first” story: public records, official datasets, court documents, audits, budgets, filings. Then add at least one expert voice and try for affected voices. If you still cannot get voices, pitch it as a tightly sourced explainer.
How do I avoid writing something unsafe or legally risky?
Attribute, verify, keep receipts, and seek response. Learn from: RCFP and SPJ Ethics. If you make a serious allegation, you must have strong evidence, careful language, and fairness.
What should I do in the next 30 days (simple plan)?
Week 1: Read 10 Mother Jones pieces and outline 3 of them. Build your “style map.”
Week 2: Generate 10 story ideas and run the evidence check. Choose 2.
Week 3: Build a document stack + 2 interviews for one idea. Draft a short explainer on your own blog.
Week 4: Write a professional pitch and send it to Mother Jones using their official guidelines, then repeat with a second idea.
Mother Jones — direct links (official + exploration): Pitching + freelancing fundamentals: Research + public records tools: Fact-checking + credibility: Writing + editing practice: Optional: build your clip base (publish samples):

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe
Subscribe
Shopping Cart
Scroll to Top