Guide: How to Write for Lawfare (and Use It to Earn Money) — Step by Step
This is a simple, step-by-step guide to help you write strong blog posts, essays, guest posts, and analysis pieces in the Lawfare style — and then use those skills to get published and build a path toward paid writing.
Lawfare is not a casual “send us anything” blog. It is a serious publication about law, national security, and policy. So the strategy is: learn their shape, build a small proof base, apply the right way, and use Lawfare clips + research habits to unlock paid work.
This guide includes a lot of links from Lawfare and from primary-source research sites (so you can verify facts like a pro). Read it like a practical SOP. Bookmark it. Reuse it.
Section 1 · Understand the publication
What Lawfare actually is — and what “good” looks like there
Start by reading Lawfare’s official “About” page like a writer, not like a casual reader. Lawfare describes itself as a non-profit multimedia publication focused on “Hard National Security Choices,” and it aims for academic-level depth with magazine-level readability at the pace of news. It publishes written work, audio, and other formats, and it covers topics across national security law, democracy, cybersecurity, executive power, domestic extremism, foreign policy, and more.
That sentence tells you the writing standard: clear, careful, sourced, and useful. If your writing is vague, emotional, or “hot take” style, it will feel wrong here. But if you can explain complex issues like a calm teacher (with real sources), you can learn this style even as a beginner.
Use these Lawfare “home base” links while you learn the site: Lawfare homepage, About Lawfare, Topics page, Masthead, Student Contributor info, Student Program (applications open notice), Job Board, Subscribe, Support, Store.
Lawfare publishes many formats, but strong pieces usually include:
- A clear legal or policy question (not a vague opinion).
- A real event, case, statute, or document you can point to.
- A careful explanation of what the text says and what the options are.
- Boundaries: what we know, what we don’t know, and what assumptions you use.
- Specific “so what” value for policymakers, practitioners, or engaged readers.
Tip: Open the Topics page and skim 10 recent posts. The tone is measured and the claims are usually supported by primary sources or direct citations.
Lawfare aims to be useful to people who need accuracy:
- lawyers, researchers, analysts, journalists, policy staff, academics
- students and early-career readers learning national security law
- curious readers who want substance without a paywall
Your job is to respect that reader. You can use simple language, but you must be precise, fair, and sourced. Lawfare’s own “About” page explains the goal: substantive analysis that is accessible but deep.
| Format (your output) | What it looks like | Evidence it needs | Best for beginners |
|---|---|---|---|
| Explainer | “What does this law / doctrine / executive order do?” | Primary text + a few credible secondary references | Yes (if you define terms clearly) |
| Case / litigation note | “What did the court decide and why does it matter?” | Opinion PDF + docket basics + precedent links | Yes (if you summarize carefully) |
| Document guide | “Here’s how to read this policy memo / report” | Document + key excerpts + context sources | Yes (great training) |
| Policy options memo | “What are the realistic paths forward?” | Law + institutional constraints + tradeoffs | Later (harder, but powerful) |
Section 2 · Fit your idea
Is your idea a Lawfare-shaped idea?
A beginner mistake is to pitch a “topic.” Example: “I want to write about cybersecurity.” That is not an idea. That is a category. A Lawfare-shaped idea is a specific question at the intersection of law, policy, and real-world events.
Use this one-line filter: Can I point to a law, case, document, or official action and ask a narrow question about what it means? If yes, you are closer. If no, you need to narrow your angle.
Use the Topics page to understand the site’s coverage map. Lawfare’s navigation lists topic areas like armed conflict, congress, courts & litigation, criminal justice & rule of law, cybersecurity & tech, democracy & elections, executive branch, foreign relations & international law, intelligence, states & localities, surveillance & privacy, and terrorism & extremism.
Does your piece sit at the nexus of law + security + policy?
Lawfare’s Student Contributor Program itself is described as supporting work on issues at the nexus of national security, law, and policy. That tells you the core “shape.” Even if you are writing about a domestic issue, you need a legal/policy hook.
- Bad fit: “This politician is bad.”
- Better: “What authority does the executive branch have to do X, and what limits exist?”
- Better: “How does a court’s decision change what agencies can do next?”
Can you show your work with sources a reader can verify?
Lawfare readers care about verification. So your piece should naturally include links to: statutes, executive orders, official memos, court opinions, credible reports, and transcripts. If you cannot cite the source, it becomes opinion. That won’t work well here.
- Use Congress.gov for bills and laws.
- Use Federal Register for executive actions and rules.
- Use Supreme Court slip opinions (or official court sites) for court decisions.
- Use GovInfo for official government publications.
Is your “angle” different from what Lawfare already has?
Before you write, search the site. Use the Lawfare search box on the homepage or use “site:” Google search: site:lawfaremedia.org your keywords. Also use the Topics page to see what’s already been covered.
- If Lawfare already has 10 explainers on your question, your angle must add something new.
- “New” can mean: new facts, new document, new case posture, new legal theory, or a clearer explainer.
| Idea generator | Pick one | Then attach | Then ask |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topic | Cybersecurity, courts, surveillance, democracy, etc. | A real trigger (memo, EO, bill, case) | “What does it legally allow or forbid?” |
| Institution | Congress, executive branch, court, agency | A constraint (jurisdiction, standing, statute) | “What are the limits and loopholes?” |
| Document | Report, guidance, order, treaty text | A real audience (policymakers, firms, public) | “What should readers notice in lines 1–50?” |
| Event | Hearing, strike, election, incident | A legal mechanism (authority, procedure) | “What happens next under the rules?” |
Section 3 · Prepare yourself
Build your base: clips + research habits (the beginner ladder)
If you are new to law/policy writing, you should not start with “I want Lawfare to publish me.” Start with: “I want to write one excellent, sourced, calm explainer.” Then repeat. That is the ladder.
Lawfare itself says it has an in-house team plus many contributors, and it has a Student Contributor program to foster the next generation. So your best path is to build proof that you can research and write responsibly.
Before you apply anywhere, publish 3–5 short, clean pieces on a platform you control: your blog, Medium, Substack, LinkedIn, or a student journal site. Make them Lawfare-style:
- Use a narrow question (one issue per post).
- Link primary sources (bill text, EO, opinion, report).
- Explain terms like you’re teaching a smart beginner.
- End with “what this changes” (2–4 bullets).
These clips become your “writing sample” proof. Even if Lawfare does not accept unsolicited pieces from everyone, your clips prove you can do the work and follow an editorial standard.
Law/policy writing is not just writing. It’s verifying. Create a browser folder called “Primary Sources” and include:
- Congress.gov (bills, laws, committees)
- Federal Register (rules, notices, EOs)
- GovInfo (official PDFs, reports, CFR)
- eCFR (current regulations)
- Supreme Court (opinions, orders)
- D.C. Circuit (often relevant in admin/natsec)
A beginner advantage: you can win with clean sourcing even if you are not a famous expert.
Now build the actual habit that makes your writing “Lawfare-grade”: a repeatable research note template. Copy this into a Google Doc or Notion page and reuse it for every piece.
- Question: What is the exact legal/policy question (one sentence)?
- Trigger: What event/document made this question urgent (link it)?
- Primary sources: 3–7 links (bill text, EO, opinion, report, agency page).
- Key excerpts: paste 3–6 short quotes with page/section labels.
- Definitions: list terms a beginner might not know (standing, jurisdiction, delegated authority, etc.).
- What changed: what is new compared to last week/month?
- Constraints: what can’t happen because of law/procedure/time?
- So what: 3 bullets for why any reader should care.
- Open questions: 3 bullets of what is unknown or contested.
Now use Lawfare itself as your training gym. Lawfare’s Topics page shows recent posts across topic areas and formats, including news posts and analysis. You can click “See All” within a topic on the Topics page and build a reading list.
You can also study recurring formats you see on the site. For example, on the Topics page you can see items like “The Situation” (a recurring analysis format) and topic-tagged “Lawfare Daily” items. You don’t need to copy these exactly. But you should learn how Lawfare headlines, how it frames questions, and how it explains context quickly.
Finally, learn who runs what by using the Lawfare Masthead. It lists editors and staff roles (like executive editor, managing editor, and other editorial positions), so you can understand how the editorial machine works.
Section 4 · Practical workflow
Student Contributor Program: how to apply (step-by-step)
If you are a student, the most direct “official” writing path on Lawfare is the Student Contributor Program. Lawfare’s 2025 announcement explains that the program allows current students to submit articles and provide research support on issues at the nexus of national security, law, and policy.
The same announcement states that the program is open to: law students in their second and third years, LLMs, and SJDs (or foreign equivalent), and that graduate students in relevant fields will also be considered.
It also provides an application link and a deadline (for that cycle): applications due by September 12, 2025. Even if you are reading this later, the process logic stays the same: you will likely see a new announcement each year, with updated dates.
Start with these two official pages: Interested in Becoming a Student Contributor? and Student Contributor Program Applications Are Now Open.
Confirm you match the eligibility (and write it clearly)
When you apply, don’t make the reader guess your status. State your program and year clearly: “2L at X,” “LLM candidate focusing on Y,” “graduate student in Z.” The 2025 announcement lists eligible categories and says graduate students in relevant fields can be considered.
- If you are outside those categories, still read this guide: you can build clips and pursue internships and paid work.
- If you are eligible, treat this like a competitive application: be specific and professional.
Create (or polish) one strong writing sample in Lawfare style
Your writing sample should not be a vague essay. It should feel like a Lawfare post: one question, real sources, a calm tone, and a clean structure.
- Length: 1,200–2,200 words is usually enough for a strong sample.
- Structure: clear headings (H2/H3 style) and short paragraphs.
- Sources: 6–15 links, with at least 3–5 primary sources.
- Clarity: define terms and avoid jargon without explanation.
If you do not have a sample yet, write one on your own blog and link it in your application. That shows you can finish work.
Write a “research proof” paragraph (not just a bio)
The program is not only about writing; it includes research support. So show you can do research. Add a paragraph like:
- “I regularly read primary source documents and summarize key excerpts.”
- “I have experience with docket tracking / legislative tracking / FOIA basics / policy research.”
- “I can produce annotated notes and cite sources cleanly.”
Even if you are new, you can still show process: “Here is my research note template, and here is how I use it weekly.”
Fill the application carefully and treat it like an editor will read it
The 2025 announcement links to a formal application (“Please apply here”) and gives a hard deadline. Do not rush the form. Write in complete sentences. Avoid hype. Focus on what you can deliver reliably.
- Use a clean, factual bio (1 short paragraph).
- Include 1–2 topic areas you can contribute in (use the Topics list).
- Propose 2–3 concrete story ideas (each with a source link).
- Link your writing sample(s).
Now let’s make your story ideas stronger. Here is a simple “Lawfare pitch mini-template” you can reuse. You can paste it into a note and fill it in for each idea.
- Working headline: [clear and specific]
- One-sentence question: [the exact legal/policy question]
- Trigger: [what happened + link]
- Primary sources (3–7): [links]
- What readers will learn: [3 bullets]
- Why now: [1–2 sentences]
- Outline: [5–7 headings]
- My credibility: [why you can do this responsibly]
If you want to learn what Lawfare values in narrative and explanation, study the kind of pieces that appear under topics. On the Topics page, you can see book reviews, news posts, and recurring analysis formats (for example, items like “The Situation”). That variety is good news: you can enter with explainers, document guides, or case notes, not only huge essays.
Section 5 · Money side
How you actually earn money using Lawfare (honestly)
Let’s be direct: Lawfare is a non-profit publication, and it focuses on quality and public access. Some writing paths on Lawfare are more “publication + portfolio” than “paid per guest post.” So the smart strategy is to use Lawfare in two ways:
- Track 1 (publication path): publish via the Student Contributor Program (student pathway) and build high-trust clips.
- Track 2 (paid path): apply to paid internships and use Lawfare-grade clips to unlock paid writing, research, and policy work elsewhere.
Here are the most concrete “paid” signals publicly visible on the site: Lawfare posts internship opportunities that include hourly pay and application instructions. For example, a Summer 2025 internship post lists compensation of $17.50/hr (with 15–20 hours/week) and notes the internship is paid. Another post for Fall 2025 internships provides an application email (applications@lawfaremedia.org) and a list of required materials (resume, cover letter, transcript, writing sample).
| Path | What you produce | Direct money? | Best next action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Contributor Program | Articles + research support | Not clearly published as “per-article pay” | Apply via the program pages + submit strong samples |
| Internships (Lawfare) | Editorial/research work (site content support) | Yes (paid hourly in postings) | Apply via the internship opportunity posts |
| Job Board (Lawfare resource) | Find jobs in the field | Yes (job salary depends) | Use Job Board weekly to find paid roles |
| Leverage clips elsewhere | Pitches to other publications | Yes (varies by outlet) | Use Lawfare-grade writing to pitch paying magazines/sites |
If you need a simple, beginner-friendly “paid” plan, internships are the cleanest path because the posting itself states pay and duties. Use these links to learn the pattern:
- Summer 2025 internship opportunities (includes pay and hours).
- Fall 2025 internship opportunities (includes application email and required materials).
- Spring 2026 internship opportunities (check updated details and dates).
Even if internship dates change, the skill proof stays the same: a clean writing sample, strong sourcing, and reliable research habits.
Lawfare’s Job Board is a resource page where opportunities in the national security / law / policy world are posted. Use it like a weekly habit:
- Open: Lawfare Job Board
- Make a list of roles that match your interests (privacy, cyber, rule of law, litigation support, research).
- Use your Lawfare-style clips as writing samples when applying.
The Job Board page includes a contact address for questions: jobboard@lawfaremedia.org.
Now let’s turn this into an actionable “money plan” you can follow even as a beginner. Choose one of these tracks depending on your situation:
- Track A (Student): Apply to the Student Contributor Program, publish 2–4 clips elsewhere, and use those clips in your application.
- Track B (Need income soon): Build 2 strong writing samples and apply for paid internships as soon as postings appear.
- Track C (Not a student): Use this guide to produce Lawfare-style essays and pitch them to paying outlets or use them to get policy/research roles.
- Track D (Career leverage): Publish one flagship explainer and use it as your “hero sample” for fellowships, clerkships, NGOs, think tanks, and writing gigs.
One more important thing: Lawfare says it provides its content free of charge and supports its work via donations and monthly donors. This matters to you because it tells you the culture: Lawfare is mission-driven, and the editorial bar will often feel closer to a serious journal than to a casual blog. So your most sustainable “earn money” approach is to treat Lawfare as a credibility engine: skills + clips → paid roles, paid writing, and paid research elsewhere.
Section 6 · Ethics & AI
Very important: accuracy, fairness, and responsible AI use
Lawfare’s entire brand is trust. It aims to provide non-partisan, timely analysis with depth and readability. That means your writing has to be more careful than a typical blog post. You are not only writing; you are building a reputation.
- Inventing facts or “probably” claims without sources.
- Mixing advocacy with analysis without clearly labeling it.
- Quoting headlines instead of linking primary texts.
- Overconfident legal conclusions without explaining uncertainty.
- Ignoring procedure: standing, jurisdiction, timing, agency process.
If you do not know, say you do not know, and explain what would resolve the question. That is strong writing here.
- Use AI for outlines and section ordering, then write in your own words.
- Use AI to simplify language after you finish your draft.
- Use AI as a fact-check assistant to ask: “Which claim needs a citation?”
- Use AI to generate a checklist of possible counterarguments, then verify manually.
Rule: if you cannot defend every claim with sources you trust, do not publish it. AI can help you draft, but it cannot be your authority.
Here is a practical accuracy routine you can follow before publishing any law/policy piece. It will feel slow at first. Then it becomes automatic.
- Claim scan: highlight every sentence that contains a factual claim.
- Source match: for each factual claim, attach a link (primary source if possible).
- Quote check: verify quotes are exact and in context.
- Numbers check: verify dates, counts, citations, section numbers.
- Counterpoint: add one paragraph: “Here is the strongest counterargument.”
- Scope line: add one sentence: “This piece focuses on X, not Y.”
- Uncertainty: if uncertain, label it and explain what would change your view.
Section 7 · Micro-SOP
Final checklist before you submit, apply, or publish
Use this checklist every time you create a Lawfare-style piece. It prevents beginner errors and makes your work feel professional. This also helps if you are applying to the Student Contributor Program or an internship.
Section 8 · Quick answers
FAQ + a big link library (so you can learn faster)
- Lawfare homepage
- About Lawfare
- Topics page (browse by area)
- Masthead (editors and staff)
- Interested in Becoming a Student Contributor?
- Student Contributor Program Applications Are Now Open (example cycle)
- Summer internship opportunities
- Fall internship opportunities
- Spring internship opportunities
- Job Board
- Subscribe
- Support
- Store
- Congress.gov (bills, laws, committees)
- Federal Register (rules, notices, executive actions)
- GovInfo (official PDFs and publications)
- eCFR (current regulations)
- U.S. Supreme Court (opinions and orders)
- U.S. Courts (federal courts directory)
- U.S. State Department (official statements and policy)
- U.S. Department of Justice
- Department of Homeland Security
- CIA (official resources and releases)
- NSA (official resources)
- United Nations (treaties, documents, resolutions)
- Day 1: Read “About Lawfare” and open the Topics page. Pick one topic.
- Day 2: Read 5 posts in that topic. Write 1-sentence summaries + list sources.
- Day 3: Pick one primary document (bill, EO, report). Highlight key excerpts.
- Day 4: Draft an outline (5–7 headings) answering one narrow question.
- Day 5: Write 1,200–1,800 words, calm tone, sources linked.
- Day 6: Run the accuracy routine and simplify language.
- Day 7: Publish your clip and prepare your next idea or application materials.